Wal-Mart gets sued over CD
What are your thoughts?
Wal-Mart gets sued over CD
What are your thoughts?
Just some folks trying to get some WalMart cash. The parents should have just taken the CD back to the store and got their $15 back. The judge should award the family $15 and let them pay for walmarts lawyer.
“As soon as public service ceases to be the chief business of the citizens, and they would rather serve with their money than with their persons, the State is not far from its fall”
This has to be the stupidest lawsuit yet. The parents should be shot for being stupid.
A guy once told me, "Do not have any attachments, do not have anything in your life you are not willing to walk out on in 30 seconds flat if you spot the heat around the corner."
Neil McCauley (Robert DeNiro): Heat 1995
It may be a dumb case but the jury seems to love dumb folks-look at the hot coffee lady at Mickey'Ds.
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." Ben Franklin
Remember this motto to live by: "Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, martini in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming 'WOO- HOO what a ride!'"
Oh my god these people are from my home county. We are not all this stupid.
It's the price of oil, the war of the spoils, where's your bucket for the big bailout? Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, we've got a lot to drink about!.
Bull****. Just Bull****.
As much as I don't like Walmart, this lawsuit is rediculous. I pray for a judge with the guts to rule against these people and make them pay the Walmart attorney fees. These spurious lawsuits have got to end! Time to set an example!
"Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country."
- Herman Göring at the Nuremburg trials (thoughts on democracy)
God I'm torn, on the one hand its the most ridiculous law suit I've ever heard of, on the other hand they're suing WALMART!!!! I'm soooo confused
People will miss that it once meant something to be Southern or Midwestern. It doesn't mean much now, except for the climate. The question, “Where are you from?” doesn't lead to anything odd or interesting. They live somewhere near a Gap store, and what else do you need to know? - Garrison Keillor
My real question is "What is a likeness of David Beckham doing in a Nativity scene?" See the news item to the right of the article.
Now if they were suing Walmart for being a blight on the landscape, guilty, guilty, guilty!
Adrift in a sea of beige
It also has this:Originally posted by boilerplater
The waxwork tableau also features President Bush, British Prime Minister Tony Blair and Prince Philip as the three Wise Men; actors Hugh Grant and Samuel L. Jackson as shepherds; and disco diva Kylie Minogue as an angel.
I thought Wal Mart only sold the censored CDs....
This just seems to be a case of people wanting someone else to parent their kids for them.....
You get all squeezed up inside/Like the days were carved in stone/You get all wired up inside/And it's bad to be alone
You can go out, you can take a ride/And when you get out on your own/You get all smoothed out inside/And it's good to be alone
Wow, so whenever I heard the F-word at 13 years old I was entitled to $75,000? I hear that word just about every time I'm out in public, and my Dad probably exclaimed it when I was first born. Come on we're not talking about pornography here. I guess people get caught up the WalMart's wholesome image and think that every rock or rap CD is going to be performed by that stupid smiley face.
Who do I make the check out to?
On one hand, retailers like walmart stress that they check ID's for purchases of violent video games and "parental advisory" music. If they failed to adequately train their employees to screen the customer, then they are at fault.
On the other hand...just take the damn cd back and get your money refunded. jeesh.
Dude, I'm cheesing so hard right now.
The story doesn't say who bought the CD. For all we know the parents bought the CD. Even if a 13 year old kid bought the CD, if it doesn't have a parental advisory label, why would the cashier even ask for ID?Originally posted by boiker
These parents are pathtic! Are they such horrible parents that they can't just take the CD away from their kid and explain that they don't think it is appropriate. I do believe you can say the f-word in a PG-13 movie, so I don't understand what the big deal with the F-word on a CD purchased by a 13 year old is.
When I was 13 I was listening to all kinds of music with foul language. My parents only concern was that they didn't have to hear that "god awful racket" I was playing 2 Live Crew, SOD, and all kinds of profanity-laced punk.
"I'm a white male, age 18 to 49. Everyone listens to me, no matter how dumb my suggestions are."
- Homer Simpson
to find a potentially objectionable cd at Wal-Mart without a parental advisory label is an anomoly. Wal-Mart is more concerned with this stuff than anyone. Anyway, yes...the whole situation is ridiculous.Originally posted by Repo Man
Dude, I'm cheesing so hard right now.
Hmmm yet another dumb lawsuit to put personal blame on big money companies. This lawsuit is as dumb as all the lawsuits against Mc Donald's, etc....
Why do courts even bother to take on these lawsuits? Can't they declare them unadmissable for being just dumb for trying to put the balme on someone that doesn't have the direct blame?
Originally posted by boiker
Which opens them up to things like this. If they are going to designate themselves the gatekeepers....
That's kind of what I was thinking. But I still have my misgivings. I have found myself on the recieving end of that type of expectation -- that because I try hard to be ______ (fill in the blank), if I fail or do not live up to my usual high standards, I am given hell for it. That always makes me mad. If I am usually nice, and I say something which inadevertently offends people, I feel that my track record should get me treated as "Well, it must have just been a mistake because we KNOW you wouldn't do anything to intentionally hurt people" rather than "See, she isn't Perfect. kill the b*tch!!!! who wants to join in the lynching???"Originally posted by mentarman
So, I feel like the judge needs to tell the parents to stuff it. If they are that anal about what their kid listens to, all you have to do is buy the CD and prescreen it yourself, personally, and you can return it if fails to meet your standards. When my kids were little, my husband and I would rent a movie the kids wanted to see, pre-screen it and then watch it with them. If it was something they REALLY wanted to see but was "too much" for them (like Jurassic Park, when they were still quite young), this allowed us to be gatekeepers in a very friendly way and not an imprisoning way -- we could warn them about surprises and the like and help them watch it without it being a psychologically scarring event.
EDIT: Actually, my kids are 15 and 17 and my husband recently pre-screened "The Chronicles of Riddick" before handing it over with an "all clear -- no excessive gore, etc" for them to watch.
Last edited by Michele Zone; 14 Dec 2004 at 6:41 PM.
I wonder if Wal-Mart opened themselves up to liability when they began censoring records.
Agreed. Do it. End of story.Originally posted by giff57
Thats a mighty fine example those :****ks are setting for their 13 year old daughter.
"See sweety, it's ok to be a looser and take some one elses money.......it's all nice and legal too."
Isn't democracy great.
Lawsuits are tricky things... even the most ludicrous case can make sense in the court of law. From what the article says, it seems kind of silly, but who knows the actual circumstances. But I think things would go a whole hell of a lot smoother if we had tort reform that required civil court losers to pay all lawyer fees.
...for example, the infamous "McDonalds Coffee" lawsuit, where the coffee was served 40f hotter than could actually be drank at, and the spill created pretty major disfigurement and significant medical bills (tens of thousands of dollars) - the suit was for the medical costs exactly. The large judgement came from the court, and was not asked for.
They didn't censor the records. (As in edit them). They chose not to sell them. Last I checked this was still (somewhat) a free market economy, and retailers have a right to pick what they do and don't carry. If I was the great throbbing brain of Wal Mart, making buh-zillions appealing to righteous indignation, why would I carry some objectionable CD for an extra $250k a year in revenue. Now, if we're talking serious hard core Wal-Porn (trademark pending), it might be worth it.Originally posted by jordanb