Urban planning community | #theplannerlife

+ Reply to thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Another sight from planning hell

  1. #1
    Cyburbia Administrator Dan's avatar
    Registered
    Mar 1996
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    14,737
    Blog entries
    3

    Another sight from planning hell

    Growth for growth's sake is the ideology of the cancer cell. -- Edward Abbey

  2. #2

    Registered
    Dec 2001
    Location
    behind the Circle K
    Posts
    176
    What IS that? Do they drive around with a billboard on the top of the van?!

  3. #3
    Cyburbian boiker's avatar
    Registered
    Dec 2001
    Location
    West Valley, AZ
    Posts
    3,895

    lucky for us

    that's illegal in Peoria.
    Dude, I'm cheesing so hard right now.

  4. #4
    Cyburbian Emeritus Chet's avatar
    Registered
    Aug 2001
    Location
    South Milwaukee
    Posts
    8,935
    Why is it illegal? It's a state DMV licensed vehicle, so how can you differentiate it from a plumber's work van with his name and logo on the side?

    Does it meet the definition of "portable graphic" or something?

  5. #5
    Cyburbian boiker's avatar
    Registered
    Dec 2001
    Location
    West Valley, AZ
    Posts
    3,895
    the sign mounted to the top of the vehicle is advertising for a product or store that is not located at the same location as the 'sign' and the 'vehicle/sign' would be considered portable.

    i guess i have a couple places in the ordinance where i could get'em.
    Dude, I'm cheesing so hard right now.

  6. #6
    Cyburbian Emeritus Chet's avatar
    Registered
    Aug 2001
    Location
    South Milwaukee
    Posts
    8,935

    hmmm. I'm still struggling with that.

    Zoning is tied to "real property". (See the examples given in prior thread discussions of underground zoning, etc.)

    To whom do you send the notice of violation, and where do you cite the violation as occuring if the vehicle is mobile? I would posit that most municipalities would lose it on a zoning contest, but may have other ways to skin the cat.

  7. #7
    Cyburbian Emeritus Chet's avatar
    Registered
    Aug 2001
    Location
    South Milwaukee
    Posts
    8,935

    A clarification

    If its parked, for example, in a commercial parking lot, I can cite it as a portable graphic, but I have to cite the property owner or leasor, and not the owner of the vehicle. My "police power" does not extend to the vehicle, but is limited to the property itself.

  8. #8
    Cyburbian boiker's avatar
    Registered
    Dec 2001
    Location
    West Valley, AZ
    Posts
    3,895

    Re: hmmm. I'm still struggling with that.

    Originally posted by bturk
    Zoning is tied to "real property". (See the examples given in prior thread discussions of underground zoning, etc.)

    To whom do you send the notice of violation, and where do you cite the violation as occuring if the vehicle is mobile? I would posit that most municipalities would lose it on a zoning contest, but may have other ways to skin the cat.
    If it's on ROW, we wouldn't be able to do anything, however, my friends at the police station may.

    If the vehicle is on private property, lets say in a parking lot. We've tickted vehicle owners, the property owners, etc... as permitted by our ordinance and nearly all have been upheld in court.

    Here's some clips out of the sign code..

    Prohibited signs..
    ...sign containing flashing or running light or movement or the illusion of movement...portable or wheeled signs...signs placed on parked vehicles or trailers to advertise product or direct people to a property that it is located on or nearby...

    the only signs allowed on vehicles are signs that are specifically advertising the business contained within or utilizing the vehicle for that business' purpose.
    Dude, I'm cheesing so hard right now.

  9. #9
    Cyburbian mike gurnee's avatar
    Registered
    Feb 1998
    Location
    Greensburg, Kansas
    Posts
    3,036
    Sigh...time to redo the sign regs. Ads on busses were slightly annoying, but this?

  10. #10
    Cyburbian Emeritus Chet's avatar
    Registered
    Aug 2001
    Location
    South Milwaukee
    Posts
    8,935
    Ok Boiker, now we're on the same page I think. Good to see you got the ticket to the vehicle owner stand up.

+ Reply to thread

More at Cyburbia

  1. Just graduated and no work in sight
    Career Development and Advice
    Replies: 9
    Last post: 23 Jun 2010, 12:50 PM
  2. There is no sight so sad...
    Friday Afternoon Club
    Replies: 19
    Last post: 26 Dec 2008, 10:59 AM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last post: 17 Aug 2005, 5:23 PM
  4. Sight Triangles
    Transportation Planning
    Replies: 1
    Last post: 03 Sep 2002, 2:53 PM