Sorry. Too subtle. However the point stands. A lot depends on what you have in your arsenal of international support, preparation, and intelligence.Originally posted by el Guapo
In the best scenario, you would have taken such warnings to heart and marshaled world support to such an extent that the attack did not happen. For example, the U.S. is a leader in world cooperation on non proliferation to the extent that the nuclear materials were not available.
Equally good, the intelligence was sufficient to stop the attack before it occurred.
In the event of the attack, a multi-national force to occupy Iran. War crimes trials for those who are directly responsible. Still, it would be better if there had not been an attack under your poll scenario, wouldn't it.