My blog post at CNU on the subject.
Bloomberg's "micro-units" are too bigMy blog post at CNU on the subject.
Instead of linking to other sites, how about you describe it here? If you want to talk about a topic, give some comments or explain the concept then link... just linking is not a way to start a conversation....Originally posted by lewyn
A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. -Douglas Adams
Why would you not count the bathroom as square footage? Was it a shared bath? If it wasn't certainly it should be included in the unit size as I am sure there would probably be space in there to put things that would otherwise clutter your 145 sq ft (soap, razors, TP, toothbrushes...)
While 300 sq ft is not a large place, it is certainly a size that woud appeal to people and the clustering of so many units of that size would bring demands on the City's infastructure more than a few 200 sq foot apartments carved out of a building whose typical floor plan would be a 600-700 sq ft apartment.
We hope for better things; it will arise from the ashes - Fr Gabriel Richard 1805
Define "wet lands" "tidal wet lands" "vernal pools"
Quote