My fair city's council is contemplating taking a giant leap backwards and amending an ordinance adopted in 2008 that prohibits off-street parking to be located between a building's street-front and the adjacent street. We have had about 15 new commercial developments since the adoption of the ordinance, all of which have conformed but that is not enough to convince the council that it isn't hindering commercial growth.
Many of you have read, or at least become familiar with, Dr. Donald Shoup's work regarding the wastefulness, among many other reasons, of the conventional "sea of parking" located in front of a building and some may have adopted similar ordinances limiting the location of off-street parking. We adopted said ordinance to mold new development and redevelopment into a more pedestrian scale and create a more intimate sense of place throughout the entire city. I should ad that the city is 14 sq.miles with a population of 13,000.
My question to you is, do you have any pictures I may use in a presentation to my council illustrating how non-residential developments, particularly retail commercial, succeeds without parking between the building street-front and the adjacent street? Or, are you familiar with a similar presentation or study I may reference?
Wouldn't you know all this discussion got started because a gas station developer doesn't want to vary from his standard model of parking spaces along the building with the gas pumps and canopy between the building and the adjacent street.
Thanks all.


Quote