Urban planning community | #theplannerlife

+ Reply to thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Accessory uses all alone?

  1. #1
    Jan 2008
    Manhattan, Kansas

    Accessory uses all alone?

    Like every code I've worked with, ours doesn't allow accessory uses on a lot absent a primary use. In other words, you can't have a shed on a lot if there's no house on it. Unlike with most regulations, I can't come up with what we're protecting the public from with this rule. I'd like to tell the questioner "no, it's against the rules, and here's why...".
    Any thoughts out there?

  2. #2
    Cyburbian Masswich's avatar
    Nov 2002
    Ocean to the east, land to the west

    Use or Structure?

    I'd differentiate between an accessory use and an accessory structure. Accessory uses are often discouraged because they are not appropriate at the scale of most primary uses but are OK as a sideline. For example, home occupations are different from office buildings and would be more of an accessory use. Ditto the factory shop at the manufacturer in the industrial zone.

    As for accessory structures, that's a harder one. To be honest, if someone wanted to build a shed on a lot without a primary structure, I'd probably let them meet the accessory structure rules. But only for a small structure that would normally be subservient to a larger primary one.
    Don't read the comments section. You want to, but don't do it.

+ Reply to thread

More at Cyburbia

  1. Bread as an accessory use
    Friday Afternoon Club
    Replies: 5
    Last post: 25 Feb 2016, 1:01 PM
  2. Uses Unconventional accessory uses
    Land Use and Zoning
    Replies: 1
    Last post: 23 Jul 2013, 1:10 PM
  3. Definitions Definition for accessory uses
    Land Use and Zoning
    Replies: 3
    Last post: 16 Jul 2010, 4:43 PM
  4. Replies: 12
    Last post: 20 Sep 2007, 3:49 PM
  5. Accessory uses gone overboard
    Land Use and Zoning
    Replies: 2
    Last post: 26 Jun 2007, 7:48 AM