Urban planning community

+ Reply to thread
Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Calling Lyle Lanley...Monorail !!!

  1. #1
    Cyburbian prudence's avatar
    Registered
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Purgatory (Mad-town)
    Posts
    675

    Calling Lyle Lanley...Monorail !!!

    Anybody in Seattle have info on the monorail thay will be buliding?? The $1-BIL plus project passed referendum last month with a 50.24% majority...
    "Dear Prudence...won't you open up your eyes? "

  2. #2
    Cyburbian Wannaplan?'s avatar
    Registered
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Gale Crater
    Posts
    2,886
    Another one?!!

    Geez, the piece of junk they already have should be torn down.

    Must be all that rain.

  3. #3
    Cyburbian Cardinal's avatar
    Registered
    Aug 2001
    Location
    The Cheese State
    Posts
    10,062
    ...it's more of a Shelbyville kind of thing...

  4. #4
    Cyburbian nerudite's avatar
    Registered
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    5,506
    The approved plan for the first phase was adopted in August of last year by the Elevated Transportation Company. Now that the citizen petition has passed in Seattle, this "company" has been morphed into the Seattle Popular Monorail Authority. There is one intial line (the green line) that will have a basically north/south route from Ballard to West Seattle (going through the major sites in and around downtown). Supposedly this first line will be built and operating in five years. Future lines will require additional ballot measures. A map of the green line route, and future routes and a great
    FAQ can be found at the SPMA website.

  5. #5
    maudit anglais
    Registered
    May 1997
    Location
    Odd-a-wah
    Posts
    6,586
    Dammit - guess what song I've got stuck in my head now?

    Monorail! Monorail! Monorail!

  6. #6
    Cyburbian nerudite's avatar
    Registered
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    5,506
    Donuts... is there anything they can't do?

  7. #7
    Cyburbian Cardinal's avatar
    Registered
    Aug 2001
    Location
    The Cheese State
    Posts
    10,062
    Monorail

    Lyle Lanley: Well, sir, there's nothing on earth
    Like a genuine,
    Bona fide,
    Electrified,
    Six-car
    Monorail!
    What'd I say?

    Ned Flanders: Monorail!

    Lyle Lanley: What's it called?

    Patty+Selma: Monorail!

    Lyle Lanley: That's right! Monorail!

    [crowd chants `Monorail' softly and rhythmically]

    Miss Hoover: I hear those things are awfully loud...

    Lyle Lanley: It glides as softly as a cloud.

    Apu: Is there a chance the track could bend?

    Lyle Lanley: Not on your life, my Hindu friend.

    Barney: What about us brain-dead slobs?

    Lyle Lanley: You'll be given cushy jobs.

    Abe: Were you sent here by the devil?

    Lyle Lanley: No, good sir, I'm on the level.

    Wiggum: The ring came off my pudding can.

    Lyle Lanley: Take my pen knife, my good man.

    I swear it's Springfield's only choice...
    Throw up your hands and raise your voice!

    All: Monorail!

    Lyle Lanley: What's it called?

    All: Monorail!

    Lyle Lanley: Once again...

    All: Monorail!

    Marge: But Main Street's still all cracked and broken...

    Bart: Sorry, Mom, the mob has spoken!

    All: Monorail!
    Monorail!
    Monorail!

    [big finish]

    Monorail!

    Homer: Mono... D'oh!

  8. #8
    Cyburbian nerudite's avatar
    Registered
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    5,506
    Originally posted by Michael Stumpf
    Barney: What about us brain-dead slobs?

    Lyle Lanley: You'll be given cushy jobs.

    Lol... I forgot the lyrics... now it will be my sticky song for the day.

    Oh yeah... BTW... the SPMA has cushy jobs open.

  9. #9
    Cyburbian Cardinal's avatar
    Registered
    Aug 2001
    Location
    The Cheese State
    Posts
    10,062
    Originally posted by nerudite


    Lol... I forgot the lyrics... now it will be my sticky song for the day.

    Oh yeah... BTW... the SPMA has cushy jobs open.
    The plant has been made....

  10. #10
    Cyburbian Howard Roark's avatar
    Registered
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Where ever you go, there you are
    Posts
    276
    A city with money is like a Mule with a spinning Wheel, no one knows how he got it, and darn if he knows how to use it!

    On a serious note, is this the most efficent thing they could come up with? I don't want to sound like Wendel Cox, but there has got to be a better way to move people at a less prohibitive cost.
    She has been a bad girl, she is like a chemical, though you try and stop it she is like a narcotic.

  11. #11
    Cyburbian Cardinal's avatar
    Registered
    Aug 2001
    Location
    The Cheese State
    Posts
    10,062
    There probably are more efficient ways to move people, but will they use them? I think one of the problems with transit in our country is that middle class people often prefer not to ride buses because they would then need to associate with "those people." Trains have had some success where there was an established rail network to begin with. Chicago is a great example of this, though waning in its utilization as jobs have become more dispered.

    Light rail and monorail are always sexy, monorail perhaps more so. Just ask Walt Disney. I suspect some aspect of land assembly or terrain may be the reason behind their choice of monorail. I wonder if, in the end, it may be something akin to Chicago's "L" (elevated local train service in the downtown area).

  12. #12
    INACTIVE
    Registered
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Toronto,Ontario
    Posts
    101
    Seattle hasn't yet chosen which of the 3 types of monorails it is building. I heard that it is possible that they might build a system similar to Vancouver's. Athough I have not ridden on the Vancouver system it is supposed to be moving people quite well. As for the critique of monorail and light rail over bus. I've used many light rail systems in Philly, Boston and New Jersey that move people much more efficiently than buses, especially if on their own reserved rights of way. Freways and arterials with few cross streets give the advantage to autos over transit. Rapid transit gives the advantage to transit use over cars. If planners continue to zone subdivisions only for auto use served by highways which are expanded and widened, while not investing in rapid transit, then transit use will continue to go down and car use up.

  13. #13
    Cyburbian Jeff's avatar
    Registered
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Mr. Cool Ice
    Posts
    4,162
    Do we have a big donut to stop the thing, or is this monorail going to have brakes that work?

  14. #14
    Cyburbian Howard Roark's avatar
    Registered
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Where ever you go, there you are
    Posts
    276
    [QUOTE]Originally posted by Michael Stumpf
    [B]There probably are more efficient ways to move people, but will they use them?

    I don't have a problem with spending a little to make things more desirable but the numbers on this just scream waste, 14 miles, 1.7 billion dollars (according to Newsweek) that is over 12o million per mile. I seem to recall light rail costing about 20 million per miles, makes it look like they are giving it away in comparison.

    Was this just a cool ruse (everyone has light rail, we will have monorail!) or is it really necessary based on existing conditions in Seattle? I don't know enough about the city to comment, but it seems they could have gone with a less maintaince intensive subway for a similar amount
    She has been a bad girl, she is like a chemical, though you try and stop it she is like a narcotic.

  15. #15
    Cyburbian Cardinal's avatar
    Registered
    Aug 2001
    Location
    The Cheese State
    Posts
    10,062
    [QUOTE]Originally posted by Howard Roark
    [B]
    Originally posted by Michael Stumpf
    There probably are more efficient ways to move people, but will they use them?

    I don't have a problem with spending a little to make things more desirable but the numbers on this just scream waste, 14 miles, 1.7 billion dollars (according to Newsweek) that is over 12o million per mile. I seem to recall light rail costing about 20 million per miles, makes it look like they are giving it away in comparison.

    Was this just a cool ruse (everyone has light rail, we will have monorail!) or is it really necessary based on existing conditions in Seattle? I don't know enough about the city to comment, but it seems they could have gone with a less maintaince intensive subway for a similar amount
    I wish I knew the answer. I would guess that much of the cost is in property acquisition, which asks the question; why not a subway? Or for that matter, consider again Chicago's L. Built over 100 years ago, it is still heavily used and a believe was recently expanded. It is built in the street right of way.

  16. #16
    Cyburbian Cardinal's avatar
    Registered
    Aug 2001
    Location
    The Cheese State
    Posts
    10,062
    Another view of the L. A great picture.

  17. #17
    Cyburbian Jeff's avatar
    Registered
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Mr. Cool Ice
    Posts
    4,162
    We got one in Philly (an El), it's great. Carries 1000s every day.

  18. #18
    INACTIVE
    Registered
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Toronto,Ontario
    Posts
    101
    One of the advantages of monorail is that the overhead rails look better than the els. Philly is planning to rebuild the west leg of the Market Frankford el over Market. I looked at the sketches and it resembles a 2 lane concrete highway viaduct with single supports. The city is trying to remake Market into a vibrant main street. It already has a lot of bars.

  19. #19
    http://www.monorail.org/index.html this place has lots of info on the new rail in seattle

  20. #20
    Also, a bit about Seattle. I live pretty far away (Spokane), but I know it pretty well. I think light rail is overall implausible there because of the existing gridlock on the ground, its unbelievable. Light rail would probably just end up hurting more than anything. It would also probably be very expensive to build in the first place and to maintain the way Seattle is set up. As far as that goes, either an elevated track or a subway was needed.

    I think they vouched for the monorail because a) They already built one line B) People here are unable to see the long term benefits of constructing a subway system and are unwilling to sacrifice the time neccesary for constructing one C) Monorails add a sexy look to the downtown that fits into the Seattle image D) Downtown transportation in Seattle seems more about image than commuting anyways so what the heck.

    What Seattle really needs is commuter trains that connect to the suburbs and sattelite cities around it so people can actually commute. There are alot of people around Seattle and that's where the traffic is the worse.

    Overall I think the expanded system will be good for downtown Seattle, but its not what the Seattle area needs in order to really get its people on mass transit.

+ Reply to thread

More at Cyburbia

  1. Monorail plans of the 1970s
    Transportation Planning
    Replies: 9
    Last post: 11 Aug 2009, 11:11 AM
  2. SAFEGE monorail, then and now
    Transportation Planning
    Replies: 25
    Last post: 17 Feb 2007, 8:15 PM
  3. Monorail and Light Rail In Seattle
    Transportation Planning
    Replies: 4
    Last post: 21 Jan 2004, 10:49 AM
  4. Monorail
    Transportation Planning
    Replies: 4
    Last post: 03 Jan 2003, 8:15 PM
  5. Freeway Monorail is old thinking
    Transportation Planning
    Replies: 1
    Last post: 30 Apr 2002, 1:17 PM