Urban planning community | #theplannerlife

+ Reply to thread
Results 1 to 24 of 24

Thread: Real dumb ??? - foot or feet

  1. #1
    Cyburbian SW MI Planner's avatar
    Registered
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    3,185

    Real dumb ??? - foot or feet

    I can't believe I'm asking this...

    I want to say that an applicant is requesting a 64' variance. Saying '64 feet variance' doesn't sound right. But, we all know a 'foot' is one foot, so technically you can't say 'a 64 foot variance'.

    What to do.....

    ((Does anyone else ever think of words or phrases so long that they start to look wrong...or am I the only jackass))

    REALLY can't wait until this day is over.....

  2. #2
    Cyburbian Emeritus Chet's avatar
    Registered
    Aug 2001
    Location
    South Milwaukee
    Posts
    8,935

    Stupid clarification ;)

    Square foot or lineal foot?

  3. #3
    maudit anglais
    Registered
    May 1997
    Location
    Odd-a-wah
    Posts
    6,589
    It would actually be a 19.5 metre variance wouldn't it?

    I would say a 64 foot variance.

  4. #4
    Cyburbian Emeritus Chet's avatar
    Registered
    Aug 2001
    Location
    South Milwaukee
    Posts
    8,935
    Here's an example of how we word area:

    Minimum open space for the property is required in the amount of 6,844 square feet (75% of the 9,125 SF lot). The current open space is 2 square feet less than required, resulting in 75-percent of the lot area preserved as open space). The Appellant is proposing to construct an addition to the residence and to pave a 603 SF driveway, resulting in 67.3-percent of the lot area preserved as open space, and is therefore requesting an 7.7-percent variance to the Code requirement.

    And here's an example of how we word distance:

    A setback of 25-feet is required from the right-of-way line. The petitioner seeks a setback of 10.3-feet from the right-of-way line to permit the reconstruction of an attached garage, and is therefore requesting a 14.7-foot variance from the right-of-way line.

    Hope it helps.

  5. #5
    Cyburbian SGB's avatar
    Registered
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Champlain-Adirondack Biosphere Reserve
    Posts
    3,387
    foot

    any of various units of length based on the length of the human foot; especially : a unit equal to 1/3 yard and comprising 12 inches -- plural foot used between a number and a noun <a 10-foot pole> -- plural feet or foot used between a number and an adjective <6 feet tall> --


    From Merriam-Webster online.

  6. #6
    Cyburbian nerudite's avatar
    Registered
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    5,506
    Hmmmm... I read bturk's response, and I've always done it a little different (although I'm not saying this is necessarily the only way to do it).

    I've always done like:

    he wants a 64-foot variance; or

    he is requesting a variance of 64 feet.

    Anyone have their Strunk and White around??

  7. #7
    Cyburbian donk's avatar
    Registered
    Sep 2001
    Location
    skating on thin ice
    Posts
    6,960
    Real picky, but I have used both, it depends on how the rest of teh sentence is phrased.

    I would write it as a variance request of 64 feet (19.5 metres)has been requested. OR I would write a 64 foot (19.5 metre)variance is requested.

    Good luck.

  8. #8
    Cyburbian SW MI Planner's avatar
    Registered
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    3,185
    Aha! Thanks for your help. Another question - do you put the dash between the number and word, example 64-feet or 64 feet. My spell check brings that up constantly and I never use it. It does that with 'single family', and 'multi-family' too. I can see multi-family needing the hypen, but single family?

    And I always thought I was pretty literate.....

  9. #9
    Cyburbian jmf's avatar
    Registered
    Sep 2001
    Location
    in limbo
    Posts
    591

    hyphens

    I avoid using them but I think the main thing is to be consistent with whatever way you choose.

  10. #10
    Cyburbian Emeritus Chet's avatar
    Registered
    Aug 2001
    Location
    South Milwaukee
    Posts
    8,935
    Originally posted by SW MI Planner
    Aha! Thanks for your help. Another question - do you put the dash between the number and word, example 64-feet or 64 feet. My spell check brings that up constantly and I never use it. It does that with 'single family', and 'multi-family' too. I can see multi-family needing the hypen, but single family?

    And I always thought I was pretty literate.....
    Ack! Reminds me of a conversation intiiated by our Clerk.

    "Do you spell that non metallic , non-metallic , or nonmetallic ?

    I don't care lady, just pick one!

  11. #11
    Cyburbian Jeff's avatar
    Registered
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Mr. Cool Ice
    Posts
    4,163
    Originally posted by SW MI Planner
    Aha! Thanks for your help. Another question - do you put the dash between the number and word, example 64-feet or 64 feet. My spell check brings that up constantly and I never use it. It does that with 'single family', and 'multi-family' too. I can see multi-family needing the hypen, but single family?

    And I always thought I was pretty literate.....

    A hyphen goes between a double adjective followed by the noun it is describing... i.e. single-family dwelling.

  12. #12
    Cyburbia Administrator Dan's avatar
    Registered
    Mar 1996
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    14,737
    Blog entries
    3
    I always worded it as ...

    "A variance of [x] [distance] to the [minimum/maximum] [something] requirement of [x] [distance].

    Thus ... a variance of 64 feet to the rear year setback requirement of 100 feet.

    I tried dual unit staff reports at my previous job. Converting was too cumbersome, so I gave it up. I was already swamped, and it took too much time checkung to ensure that square feet were properly converted into square meters.

    I expressed square feet as [number]'[superscript 2].

    I never, ever, ever use both the written and numerical form of a number, i.e. "three (3) foot variance." It's redundant and pretentious. I don't know why some folks prefer to write in that style.

    I'd love to see a staff report for a rural Texas municipality. "A variance of 103 varas to the minimum two smoke frontage requirement ..."

  13. #13
    Cyburbian Tom R's avatar
    Registered
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Akron
    Posts
    2,255

    variances

    I'd say "death to all variances" and be done with it.
    WALSTIB

  14. #14
    Cyburbian Zoning Goddess's avatar
    Registered
    Sep 1999
    Location
    400 miles from Orlando
    Posts
    13,849

    Re: Stupid clarification ;)

    Originally posted by bturk
    Square foot or lineal foot?
    Lineal foot? Isn't it linear foot?

  15. #15
    Cyburbian Trail Nazi's avatar
    Registered
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Encroaching on something
    Posts
    2,738
    I would say a 64-foot variance. And I would also say linear, but in case you want a definition.....



    lin·e·ar
    adj.
    Of, relating to, or resembling a line; straight.

    In, of, describing, described by, or related to a straight line.
    Having only one dimension.
    Characterized by, composed of, or emphasizing drawn lines rather than painterly effects.
    Botany. Narrow and elongated with nearly parallel margins: a linear leaf.


    lin·e·al
    adj.
    Belonging to or being in the direct line of descent from an ancestor.
    Derived from or relating to a particular line of descent; hereditary.
    Linear.

    This applies to both words:
    [Middle English, from Old French, from Late Latin līneālis, consisting of lines, from Latin līnea, line.]

  16. #16
    Cyburbian Emeritus Chet's avatar
    Registered
    Aug 2001
    Location
    South Milwaukee
    Posts
    8,935
    Yep, I caught that after I posted but never edited. Good eye!

  17. #17
    Cyburbian Jeff's avatar
    Registered
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Mr. Cool Ice
    Posts
    4,163
    It is linear, but you wouldn't believe the number of people that say lineal....

  18. #18
    Cyburbian Zoning Goddess's avatar
    Registered
    Sep 1999
    Location
    400 miles from Orlando
    Posts
    13,849
    Originally posted by Trail Nazi
    I would say a 64-foot variance. And I would also say linear, but in case you want a definition.....



    lin·e·ar
    adj.
    Of, relating to, or resembling a line; straight.

    In, of, describing, described by, or related to a straight line.
    Having only one dimension.
    Characterized by, composed of, or emphasizing drawn lines rather than painterly effects.
    Botany. Narrow and elongated with nearly parallel margins: a linear leaf.


    lin·e·al
    adj.
    Belonging to or being in the direct line of descent from an ancestor.
    Derived from or relating to a particular line of descent; hereditary.
    Linear.

    This applies to both words:
    [Middle English, from Old French, from Late Latin līneālis, consisting of lines, from Latin līnea, line.]
    Thank you for the excessively erudite explanation. By the way, where did you get the avatar of the pit bull with buggy eyes???

  19. #19
    Cyburbian Runner's avatar
    Registered
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    566
    I would word it:

    "a 64 foot variance"

    or

    "a variance of 64 feet"
    Cheers,
    UrbanRunner
    :)
    _____________________________
    WWJJD
    "What Would Jane Jacobs Do?"

  20. #20
    Cyburbian mike gurnee's avatar
    Registered
    Feb 1998
    Location
    Greensburg, Kansas
    Posts
    3,034
    I think it is time to take a break, have a day off. Spell check fun: "cite someone for showing inadequate sight distance on the site plan".

  21. #21
    Cyburbian donk's avatar
    Registered
    Sep 2001
    Location
    skating on thin ice
    Posts
    6,960
    One of the surveyors we deal with frequently always puts "site distance = x metres" on his site and survey plans.

  22. #22
    Cyburbian Seabishop's avatar
    Registered
    Nov 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,815
    In conclusion, just don't say FEETS.

  23. #23
    Cyburbian donk's avatar
    Registered
    Sep 2001
    Location
    skating on thin ice
    Posts
    6,960
    In conclusion, just don't say FEETS.
    Unless you live in an area where a local politican refers to his constituents as "me peoples".

    This is unfortunately true, he said it in the legislature.

  24. #24
    Cyburbian Jeff's avatar
    Registered
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Mr. Cool Ice
    Posts
    4,163
    Or unless you're saying.....

    "Woman, get me them there pigs feets out of the refrigerator...and fetch me a Bud while your at it...YEE HAW!!"

+ Reply to thread

More at Cyburbia

  1. How to get your feet wet
    Student Lounge
    Replies: 2
    Last post: 04 Aug 2013, 8:34 PM
  2. Square feet per employee?
    Economic and Community Development
    Replies: 8
    Last post: 19 May 2009, 11:10 AM
  3. How to get my feet wet: MUP
    Student Commons
    Replies: 13
    Last post: 21 Jun 2005, 10:34 AM
  4. Replies: 7
    Last post: 27 Mar 2003, 3:29 PM
  5. Minimum lot frontage: 50 feet
    Land Use and Zoning
    Replies: 5
    Last post: 11 Oct 2000, 7:44 PM