Urban planning community

+ Reply to thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Pedestrian Bridges

  1. #1
    Cyburbian
    Registered
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Townville
    Posts
    1,047

    Pedestrian Bridges

    Does anybody have any links etc...on the pro and cons of pedestrian bridges in an urban setting?

    gkm

  2. #2
    maudit anglais
    Registered
    May 1997
    Location
    Odd-a-wah
    Posts
    6,586
    What sort of pedestrian bridges?

  3. #3
    Cyburbian
    Registered
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Townville
    Posts
    1,047
    essentially bridges above street level which connect building to building.

    I am looking for some back-up from the design perspective that criticizes this type of amenity--along the lines that it is bad design to remove pedestrians from the street.

  4. #4
    Cyburbian donk's avatar
    Registered
    Sep 2001
    Location
    skating on thin ice
    Posts
    6,958
    I think it is not always bad to remove the pedestrian from the street.

    I'll use a really good example of this, that TP knows, the connection between the Eaton Centre and the old Simpson's building, it makes it way easier to cross the street there and does not seem to impact pedestrian traffic in that area. Actually there is also the option to cross under the street at that location. These other options have little/no impact on the set of lights that are also there and the amount of pedestrian traffic in this area.

    Another example of pedestrian bridges is the Skywalk to the Skydome, much nicer to walk in an elevated, heated environment when going to a concert then along the street.
    Too lazy to beat myself up for being to lazy to beat myself up for being too lazy to... well you get the point....

  5. #5

    Registered
    May 1997
    Location
    Williston, VT
    Posts
    1,371
    There is a lot of debate about the impact of the skywalks on the street level activity in downtown Spokane. They were part of a renaissance at one time, but then downtown seemed to fade again. You might want to talk to someone there. Also, of course, Minneapolis.

  6. #6
    Member dbhstockton's avatar
    Registered
    Feb 2003
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    12
    It depends on the streets that they're bridging. In Newark NJ, there's a hotel/office complex around the Amtrak station that really does suck the life out of the surrounding local streets. If the streets were uninviting before the pedestrian bridges were built, they are only more so after they were built.

    Six-lane higways, however, don't have much pedestrian appeal to begin with. There is the possibility of sinking the highway into a tunnel --for cities that can afford it. There is an ongoing controversy at the WTC site in Manhattan to that effect. The towers had formerly been linked by a large enclosed pedestrian bridge to a massive office and residential complex on the other side of a highway. Planners see an opportunity to bring this connection to street level. Others see the plan as wasteful and overly disruptive to businesses and residents in the area.

  7. #7
    Member dbhstockton's avatar
    Registered
    Feb 2003
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    12
    And since I'm from NJ, I might as well talk about Atlantic City. Casinos there sprawl for several blocks, connected by bridges. Only the Boardwalk has any interest to the pedestrian. Turn a corner, and you're faced with towering blank facades and a barren, post-apocalyptic cityscape. Vistors driving into the city are funneled right into the casino parking decks.

  8. #8
    Cyburbian Cardinal's avatar
    Registered
    Aug 2001
    Location
    The Cheese State
    Posts
    9,920
    Originally posted by Lee Nellis
    Also, of course, Minneapolis.
    Let's not forget Minneapolis' stepchild, St. Paul.

    The idea of cennecting buildings has a number of advantages from the perspective of taking people out of the elements, and thereby encouraging walking. Many of these systems (St. Paul, for instance) have retail and services located on the level of the crossways, often extending the consumer space vertically, rather than horizontally. Smart growth, perhaps?

    On the other hand, they do have drawbacks. Perhaps they siphon off some business from ground-level establishments. There are also security concerns, now that in the post 9-11 world many buildings do not permit people inside without going through screening. Lastly, some of them can be just plain ugly.

  9. #9
    maudit anglais
    Registered
    May 1997
    Location
    Odd-a-wah
    Posts
    6,586
    I haven't been able to find any specific resources regarding the impact of overhead pedestrian networks, but agree with some of the sentiments expressed here by others.

    The answer in this case is a solid "It depends".

    In Toronto's case, we don't have many overhead walkways. Instead, we've created a system of underground pedestrian passages which link most of the major downtown office buildings with Union Station. Most of the passages are lined with retail uses. It is quite busy during weekdays, but pretty dead on weekends. Some people argue that the PATH system has basically killed any opportunity for street-retail in the financial district, but I think it works quite well.

  10. #10
    Member
    Registered
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Newton, MA
    Posts
    19
    While there is a general predisposition against pedestrian bridges, for the reasons noted above (killing off street level life and retail, often tied to car parking directly adjacent to off-street development), there are some cases where it works.

    It helps with getting folks across dangerous highway-like roads, but getting people to go up and over is hard. If the grade crossing is not sufficiently scary, they skip the bridge.

    A pedestrian bridge can connect important existing above-grade nodes that are separated, usually by roads or transit. A good example in my town, Boston, is the bridge between Copley Place mall and the Prudential Center mixed use development. These two developments are period pieces that you wouldn't build today (isolated, auto oriented), but given their nature the ped bridge works well.

    Pedestrian bridges can be useful in campus settings, allowing connection between academic areas that promote collaboration that might not take place in entirely spearate buildings.

+ Reply to thread

More at Cyburbia

  1. Rating the Bridges
    Friday Afternoon Club
    Replies: 11
    Last post: 19 Oct 2010, 10:26 AM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last post: 04 Apr 2008, 3:49 PM
  3. Bridges vs. ferrries
    Transportation Planning
    Replies: 3
    Last post: 22 Jan 2008, 11:58 AM
  4. Pedestrian bridges
    Transportation Planning
    Replies: 25
    Last post: 27 Jun 2006, 10:40 AM
  5. Marsupial bridges
    Transportation Planning
    Replies: 9
    Last post: 08 Jun 2005, 5:13 PM