Urban planning community | #theplannerlife

+ Reply to thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Chicago planners want to double off street parking requirements

  1. #1
    Jul 2002

    Chicago planners want to double off street parking requirements

    Back to regular view

    Chicago at risk of being another L.A.?

    April 18, 2003

    BY FRAN SPIELMAN City Hall Reporter

    Chicago could turn into a Midwest version of Los Angeles--with more cars, increased air and water pollution and even longer commute times--if developers are required to build more off-street parking, a new study has concluded.

    In a city with 250,000 car-free families and 768,013 households--72.3 percent--with one car or less, it makes no sense for the city's new zoning ordinance to require newly constructed single-family homes and town houses to have two off-street parking spaces instead of one, according to the Zoning for Transportation Equity Coalition.

    The coalition of 30 developers, transportation advocates and environmentalists was forged out of a common concern about the impact that an increased parking requirement would have on the city. They surveyed 10 other cities to gauge the effect that increased parking requirements have on an array of issues ranging from air quality and traffic congestion to household transportation costs and construction of affordable housing.

    What they found was that the parking requirements proposed for Chicago (two spaces for every newly built single family home and town house and 1.5 spaces for large units of two bedrooms and up built in multi-unit buildings) are similar to those in effect in sprawling, auto-dependent cities like Los Angeles and Fort Worth.

    "When people know they can find a place to park, they're more likely to drive,'' said Payton Chang, land-use committee chairman for Break the Gridlock. "They're also more likely to buy a car. Fewer people will take mass transit. Commute times will increase. We already have some of the country's worst congestion. We don't need to make it worse."

    Experts have said congestion in Chicago averages 67 hours a year per person.

    The report recommends shelving the two-for-one parking requirement, maintaining the existing one-for-one mandate and giving developers flexibility to build "car light or car-free housing."

    The waiver would be based on whether the development is affordable, close to mass transit and provides amenities for pedestrians and bike riders.

    "Our concern is the cost that parking adds to producing affordable housing," said Dena Al-Khatib, development supervisor for Bickerdike Development Corp., which serves West Town, Humboldt Park and Logan Square.

    Ald. William Banks (36th), chairman of the Zoning Reform Commission and the City Council's Zoning Committee, welcomed the recommendations and said the two-for-one requirement is "not written in stone."

    Transportation and parking issues are expected to comprise the fourth, and most contentious chapter of the zoning rewrite.

    Copyright The Sun-Times Company
    All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

    le platypus charmant, chicago

  2. #2

    Oct 2001
    Solano County, California
    One of the problems with gentrification: suburbanites who move to a "cool" downtown neighborhood still think and behave like suburbanites. That means at least one car per person-and a sense of rage when the city is not designed around that Jetta or M3.

  3. #3
    Cyburbian Emeritus Chet's avatar
    Aug 2001
    South Milwaukee
    This is unfortunate. Chicago has a decent transit system. I get down there several times a year, and once I reach my destination, I never drive again until I'm ready to go home. If visitors can do it, so can residents. The article is right on one point - increasing parking will increase single-occupant vehicle trips.

    They should be focusing efforts on densitfying development near connection points. Simply waiving the new parking rule is not an incentive in my opinion.

+ Reply to thread

More at Cyburbia

  1. Replies: 4
    Last post: 09 Nov 2012, 2:51 PM
  2. Replies: 15
    Last post: 20 Sep 2012, 10:01 AM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last post: 01 Nov 2010, 2:55 PM
  4. Replies: 22
    Last post: 28 Jul 2009, 3:51 PM
  5. Replies: 7
    Last post: 12 Sep 2005, 2:05 PM