Urban planning community

  1.    Home · Search · Register

    1. rowhousing.jpg
      culdesac_design_5.jpg
      culdesac_design_2.jpg
      culdesac_design_3.jpg
      culdesac_design_4.jpg
      culdesac_design_1.jpg
      Village_Green_05.jpg
      05_Metropolis.jpg
      Village_Green_07.jpg
      06_Metropolis.jpg
      Village_Green_11.jpg
      Village_Green_13.jpg
      Wing_and_Vail_2.jpg
      Pronto_Roma_16.jpg
      Village_Green_05_rooftop.jpg
      DSC_0454.JPG
      Village_Green_03.jpg
      Vail_front.jpg
      Cool_Old_Building.jpg
      Bloggett_Home_For_Children_Redevelopment.jpg
      Blodgott.jpg
      more »

      · Next image »

      Detached rowhousing
      Detached rowhousing

      Click on image to view larger image

       · Slide Show · Next image »


      Photo Details
      hilldweller


      Cyburbian

      Registered: January 2005
      Location: Land of Confusion
      Posts: 3,740
      users gallery
      · Date: 2008-4-30 · Views: 6,541
      · Filesize: 99.8kb, 264.1kb · Dimensions: 1600 x 1197
      Additional Info
      Keywords: Detached rowhousing
      Copyright
      Will enter status later
      Source or copyright holder information

  1.   2008-6-30 2:42pm
    1. Streck
      Cyburbian


      Registered: June 2002
      Location: Southeast US
      Posts: 530

      Quality of photo is very good. Am I to rate the photo or the subject matter illustrated?
      Why is this in the category of "Best Practices?" Am I missing some commentary somewhere?
      This user is offline Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery  

  1.   2008-7-30 4:00pm
    1. hilldweller
      Cyburbian


      Registered: January 2005
      Location: Land of Confusion
      Posts: 3,740

      There's no categorization allowed in the General Development group so I put it in here. Probably not a "best practice", but I thought it was a good example of detached rowhousing. Didn't think it was bad enough to be put in the "ugly" category..
      This user is offline Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery  


Powered by: PhotoPost PHP vB3 Enhanced
Copyright 2011 All Enthusiast, Inc.