|
By jsk1983 at 2009/05/10 - 5:00pm
|
|
Do such things exist beyond the general city wide ordinances? I'm working with a CDC centered in the Chicago Lawn neighborhood on the south side of Chicago and we are hoping to improve the aesthetics of the commercial corridor. One thing we noticed is that many of the signs are hand painted or otherwise unattractive and thus wondered if there was any way to regulate this. Obviously there are plenty of sign regulations out there, but they tend to be for historic districts and affluent suburbs.
|
|
|
From a brief review of it myself, it appears to allow signs painted onto the building's surface. Obviously, the quality of any painted sign can varied wildly, and I know about the issue you're getting at, but the best route for you would be to try get such signs prohibited in the City's sign code.
Outside of that maybe you can try to convince the individual property owners to privately prohibit this type of signage on their buildings, especially when you have multi-tenant buildings.
Good luck.
Our city particularly has a long section in the UDC regarding sign regulations and design standards.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/modesto...7594333382593/
10 or 15 years ago, I used to see a lot of sign codes that would regulate number of items on a sign, use of phone numbers, white space in the sign area, and so on. Such regulation is probably questionable now, due to case law on content neutrality. You can safely regulate presentation -- time, place and manner -- but be careful.
A few things I can think of:
* Prohibit signs painted directly on a building surface. This won't stop amateurish signs painted on wood, though.
* Fairly strict size limits; 1 to 1.5 square feet of signage per linear foot of wall at the most. In inner city neighborhoods, signs will often list every product or service offered by the business, which clutters the sign face. Size limits should be able to help.
* Require channel letter and box signs. Box signs aren't the greatest, but they're reasonably priced, and need to be professionally manufactured.
* Be wary of allowing bubble awnings. IMHO, they serve no practical purpose except as a sign display area, and are usually used as a loophole around attached wall sign regulations (the entire surface is internally illuminated like a sign face, but only a portion of the awning has the message,)
* Design guides that show examples of poorly designed signs and effective, well-designed signs. Emphasize this:
* Enforcement is key. I doubt the folks that are painting these amateurish signs are getting permits.
Note they forgot to include the whole phone number. This is in Harvard, IL which is a small city at the end of a commuter rail line. It may be a stretch to call it a suburb though.
I know some might look at these handmade signs as "outsider art" or "primitive art". However, I think sign painting is becoming a lost art.
I know some might look at these handmade signs as "outsider art" or "primitive art". However, I think sign painting is becoming a lost art.