• Ongoing coronavirus / COVID-19 discussion: how is the pandemic affecting your community, workplace, and wellness? 🦠

    Working from home? So are we. Come join us! Cyburbia is a friendly big tent, where we share our experiences and thoughts about urban planning practice, planning adjacent topics, and whatever else comes to mind. No ads, no spam, no social distancing.

A Difficult (Insensitive) Question

BKM

Cyburbian
Messages
6,463
Points
29
I'm sure I'll get reamed for even posting this question, and I am not even sure of my answer to said question but, I wanted to hear the Throbbing Brain's take on this issue.

On Saturday, a disturbed individual parked his car on the San Francisco Bay Bridge and proceded to clamber around the bridge structure, threatening to commit suicide. Needless to say, multiple police, coast guard, highway patrol, ambulances, fire department units became encamped on the scene. Traffic was snarled for over 13 hours, refusing to come down. The Bay Area basically shut down.

Granted that this gentleman was somewhat disturbed.

Granted that emergency personnel have a duty to try to help.

But, granted that tens of thousands of dollars in direct costs were wasted on this episode-money that could be better spent elsewhere, perhaps???

And, granted that there are only limited resources available to society and government.

How long/how much effort/how much money should be spent on such a case? Should we eventually simply say: "Sir, help is available, but we cannot continue to tie up the bridge and police resources any longer, so we are reopening the bridge and reallocating the police?" Or, should we "indulge" (a term used by a libertarian-leaning radio host) a gentleman like this for "as long as it takes"?

Thoughts?
 

Maister

Chairman of the bored
Staff member
Moderator
Messages
28,711
Points
71
I'm sure the Trekkies here would not object if I said 'the needs of the many before the needs of the few'.....That said, I think on a more pragmatic level the issue boils down to the comparative value of preserving the existence of a single human life over the emotional and economic well-being of tens of thousands. I guess when it comes to it, I don't know |-) ....
 

Rumpy Tunanator

Cyburbian
Messages
4,473
Points
25
Interesting question. Where do you draw the line? Reminds me of that lady in Seattle who was threatening to jump off some highway bridge. Traffic was backed up pretty bad and when people passed her they told her to jump because they were pissed. So she did jump.

I saw a man climb the 6th Street bridge when I lived in Pittsburgh and they closed the bridge, although it was late at night so there wasn't any really problems. He got down eventually.

Isn't the Golden Gate Bridge the number 1 place for people committing suicide via bridge jumping?
 

mendelman

Unfrozen Caveman Planner
Staff member
Moderator
Messages
13,917
Points
57
(advice offered when obviously not knowing any of the details of this particular event)

From the compassionate angle: I would help to rescue this guy from himself with bare minimum of emergency personnel. If he is only a threat to himself, then the emergency workers should have been aggressive at taking him into custody in order to reduce the traffic stoppage as much as possible, and get everyone back to normal service.

From the less-compassionate angle: Sniper the loon, from a hovering helicopter, with a dose of sleepy juice and then get him off the bridge as quick as possible.

As for the cost of the emergency personnel, if it wasn't over-time pay, then the personnel was being paid anyway, so if one argues that 'it was a massive waste of taxpayers' money', I don't think so
 
Last edited:

The Irish One

Member
Messages
2,267
Points
25
We had the same situation in San Diego last week on the Coronado bridge, which doesn't carry a tenth of the bay bridges traffic. I wish there was some swift humane way to take care of the situation but there isn't so, it's wait and see. If you think that it cost a lot to get the person off the bridge, think about the law suits if the police just said do what you want, we're letting traffic flow. Somehow, somebody would find a way to sue, that's where the real money drain is at.
 

BKM

Cyburbian
Messages
6,463
Points
29
An interesting point, Mendelman. Especially given a recent scandal in San Francisco-firemen at certain stations were spending their quieter periods getting drunk :)

Sadly enough, the gentleman in question was basically standing right over a concrete abutment. Any move to involuntarily remove him would have meant "splat." (Which would have meant "lawsuit" from his surviving family :()

I found the talk show host somewhat convincing, actually. How far do we "indulge" people unable or unwilling to take responsibility for themselves? On the other hand, there was mental illness involved, so responsibility becomes a difficult term to define.
 

Maister

Chairman of the bored
Staff member
Moderator
Messages
28,711
Points
71
Rumpy Tunanator said:
Isn't the Golden Gate Bridge the number 1 place for people committing suicide via bridge jumping?
Yeah, I remember hearing that someplace too. I imagine places like Paris probably see their fair share of jumpers from the Eiffel Tower; Niagra Falls is in my mind is another obvious choice for jumpers in that region.... lots of other famous landmarks to jump off in lots of cities. Who I really feel sorry for, though, are the folks that commit suicide in Plano, Kenosha, Dover, Peoria and Biloxi. It's one thing to jump off a famous landmark but jumping off, say, the tallest grain elevator in town just lacks..... well, panache. :-b
 

BKM

Cyburbian
Messages
6,463
Points
29
The Irish One said:
Somehow, somebody would find a way to sue, that's where the real money drain is at.
Yep. A pretty big factor is the pool of legal sharks circling any episode like this. It's always somebody else's fault-and that somebody else can be easily sued for big bucks.
 

Rumpy Tunanator

Cyburbian
Messages
4,473
Points
25
Maister said:
Niagra Falls is in my mind is another obvious choice for jumpers in that region....
Its been a slow couple of years for Niagara Falls. Not to many people committing suicide, although the ones that survive usually say it was a stunt. This year they've pulled a few people from the brink. They seem to change their mind once they get to the edge. The American side of the rapids leading up to the falls is shallow so sometimes people stand up once they hit a rock. Although they usually can't walk out.
 

Wulf9

Member
Messages
923
Points
22
Every effort should be made to save the person. I don't want to live in the society where people would rather have a person jump than be delayed in their drive home.

If it happens once every five years, it will probably have a huge effect on traffic, like the Bay Bridge guy. If it happens more than once a year, emergency folk should find a way to address the situation and minimize the delay (e.g. take only one lane and do as much as possible to keep traffic moving.
 

BKM

Cyburbian
Messages
6,463
Points
29
Wulf's opinion was the majority on the call-in show. Gene Burns 810 KGO Radio is usually pretty thoughtful.
 

Plannerbabs

Cyburbian
Messages
1,037
Points
23
Seems like there would be a better way of doing it than calling out the entire emergency brigade. Not only does it seem kind of inefficient, but to have helicopters circling, boats, all manner of emergency vehicles with lights flashing and people yelling over megaphones (I'm imagining here from the description) must have been terrifying to the guy. We had a similar situation several years ago, and it seemed that the overwhelming official presence hurt the situation before it helped it. If there were a way of handling the situation with fewer people, it might make the situation calm down faster, as well as being more compassionate. There's nothing soothing about a helicopter rattling overhead.
 

boiker

Cyburbian
Messages
3,889
Points
26
Maister said:
Yeah, I remember hearing that someplace too. I imagine places like Paris probably see their fair share of jumpers from the Eiffel Tower; Niagra Falls is in my mind is another obvious choice for jumpers in that region.... lots of other famous landmarks to jump off in lots of cities. Who I really feel sorry for, though, are the folks that commit suicide in Plano, Kenosha, Dover, Peoria and Biloxi. It's one thing to jump off a famous landmark but jumping off, say, the tallest grain elevator in town just lacks..... well, panache. :-b
we in the Midwest don't understand this concept of vertical-ness. IF someone jumps to commit suicide here, It's probably a long leap across the flatness of an expressway, not down from a building ;) har har.

Seriously, there doesn't seem to be a humane or episode free way to resolve these instances. Traffic will get backed up.. it's not the usual routine to see someone on a bridge. A person that commits or threatens suicide in a grandiose manner is either mental or just trying to draw attention to themselves.... Like that UW-Madison student.
 

otterpop

Cyburbian
Messages
6,655
Points
28
Spend the time and personnel to try to save the guy. If a call goes out that requires reallocation of resources, then that is a decision for the watch commander must make. A mentally distraught or disturbed person is not in the same league as a knucklehead who gets lost in the forest or leaves his campfire burning and burns down the forest. The former is not responsible and should not be finacially responsible. The latter is responsible for his/her actions and should be financially held accountable.

Traffic is snarled and people are inconveniences, but that is a small price. The scale is tipped way toward saving life.
 

PlannerGirl

Cyburbian Plus
Messages
6,377
Points
29
Last summer DC had "tractor man" the old guy on a bit of farm equipment out on the mall, in a fish pond. Tied up traffic something horrible all over the metro area for almost 48 hours. The man had no bombs though he said he had a bit of TNT. If a nut on a tractor can do that to DC god help us if a guy with a real bomb decides to get busy.

grrrrrr, people in DC were quite ready to get rid of the old goat on the tractor post haste.
 

Gedunker

Moderating
Staff member
Moderator
Messages
11,491
Points
41
Maister said:
It's one thing to jump off a famous landmark but jumping off, say, the tallest grain elevator in town just lacks..... well, panache. :-b
Anybody see the news item last week about the 80yr old fellow diagnosed with a tumor? He rented a biplane and jumped out as the pilot frantically tried to hold him in. His son was quoted as saying his dad wanted to go out in a blaze of glory.

WTF? Jumping out of a perfectly good airplane from 400 feet because you are old and dying qualifies as a "blaze of glory"? I think NOT.
 

Maister

Chairman of the bored
Staff member
Moderator
Messages
28,711
Points
71
I'd be curious to hear what supporters of Right to Life have to say on the matter. This really seems to be a convoluted situation - on the one hand, the principle of 'preserve life at all costs' is a rather conservative sentiment. On the other hand, the idea of expending considerable public energy, time and funds into 'helping' people who may not even want help seems dearer to liberal hearts. Hmmmm.
 

Repo Man

Cyburbian
Messages
2,549
Points
25
I don't think that you need helicopters and all of that crap. It is overkill. What do you need a helicopter for unless you are the local news station looking for some killer footage of the guy jumping? I think that one coast guard boat, one ambulance, and one or two cop cars is plenty. You don't need 40 people to persuade a juy to not jump. At some point however, I would just leave the guy up there and open up the traffic and have the law enforcement people use up like one lane or something. 13 hours is far too long. What would have happend if emergency personnel needed to cross the bridge during this time but it was tied up with traffic? What about people who had places that they really had to be? Maybe someone was on their way to a wedding, a funeral, a job interview, to pick up the kids from daycare, an airport to stop a loved one from moving to Eurpoe (ok that only happens in movies, but you get the picture).

Oh, and the guy should reimburse the City, County, and whoever else for every single dime spent on the rescue. Then he'll think twice next time and either jump right away or seek help.
 

Tom R

Cyburbian
Messages
2,274
Points
25
$

What price a human life?
Any more its about three to five per round of depleted uranium; or 30 to 50 per pound of C-4. :-\
 

michaelskis

Cyburbian
Messages
20,175
Points
51
OK this is going to sound F’d up, but I say that they should have left the bridge open, toed his car, had someone walk out on the bridge, and it there on the edge with him (strapped in of course) and try to talk him out of it. Have one boat with a few divers in the water incase he does jump. I think that as a society some people will do something because the world is watching, or because they made something big happen. I think that we spend too many resources on these problems. I agree what someone should have offered him help (they guy who would walk out) but what effect will it have on the cars? Maybe put a tarp or something up so that people driving by could not him.

I have to cross the Mackinac Bridge every time I go back to my parents house. It is a 5 mile suspension bridge, and from what I know of, only 4 people in my lifetime have gone over the side. One was blown over while driving a Ugo, the most recent, they never found the body. Every time, it has been less than a minute, or no one has seen it happen. I think that if someone is going to jump, they are going to do it quick, because the more they think about it, the more they wait and think about other things that are good in their lives.
 
Messages
7,649
Points
29
Someone doing something so publically is a cry for help. The reason for threatening to jump or actually jumping off a famous bridge, etc, is to make external and visible their internal emotional drama. Society routinely puts people in a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" position: if you can cope, you aren't worthy of any help; if you are over the edge, then you finally get some kind of help. I have been in more than one situation where the fact that I managed to keep my cool and keep trying to effectively address the situation...meant that no one took me very seriously. It is enough to PUSH you over the edge. If we had more ... stuff .... structured to take a problem seriously before it gets to the mega-crisis stage, you wouldn't see nearly so much of this.
 

Zoning Goddess

Cyburbian
Messages
13,852
Points
39
If it was someone in my family going thru a crisis, yeah, I would want the whole world turned out to try to save him/her. Because their perspective might change once they were down.

But my practical side says: 13 hours, with helicopters? Too much. I can't imagine that suicidal people can cope with that level of activity around them, as they try to come to terms with what they're thinking of doing.
 

el Guapo

Capitalist
Messages
5,995
Points
31
Sorry, you don't have a right to be an ass to your fellow humans.

On Topic: Legalize suicide and send his estate the bill for the body clean up. If he is a threat to cars, bicyclists, fishing boats, or pedestrians passing below stop traffic, tell him to surrender, if he doesn't surrender in five minutes, fire a warning shot, if another five passes and no surrender; snipe his ass. Put his head on a pike as a warning to others. If he survives the bullet and the drop to sea level: Gitmo. Society is too complex to coddle the discontented. There's your compassionate conservatism. ;)

[ot]
Off Topic
Tom R said:
What price a human life?
Any more it’s about three to five per round of depleted uranium; or 30 to 50 per pound of C-4. :-\

Wrong. Sorry, but wrong. The US shoots at least 1000-200 5.56 or 7.62 mm rounds per human killed (Viet Nam was even higher). C4 is a demolition explosive and is rarely used in direct combat against people (Claymores are the exception). There we like to use TNT, RDX, PETN and other explosives far more because they are castable explosives that work better in artillery rounds. C4 is far too expensive for that, and it has the wrong kind of brisance. DU rounds are normally tank killer rounds and maybe 50-100 are sprayed for each tank killed by an A-10 and there are only 4 guys in a tank, 3 if it is a T-72 or better. However the M-1A2 is a beast and there are maybe 3 guys killed per 1.2 APFSDS-T fired. They are lethal.

M1A2 Main Battle Tank sports the Rheinmetal 120mm Smoothbore Cannon and is the most powerful tank weapon in existence

So you have to ask yourself, do you feel lucky, well do you Tom R?
;)
[/ot]
 

AubieTurtle

Cyburbian
Messages
894
Points
21
Spiderman comes to mind as a solution. But since there are no web slingers around, maybe someday research into non-lethal weapons will advance to the point that jumpers can be snipered with adhesive goo that will prevent them from being able to jump. Of course if it got in the person's airways it's be all over for them.

Though the jumpers don't always have a history of mental illness, some of this is the continuing payout of the movement in the 80s to save money by closing mental hospitals and putting the patients on the street with a bottle of pills and a good luck wish. That's certainly a decision that has cost several orders of magnitude greater than the savings.
 

Tom R

Cyburbian
Messages
2,274
Points
25
So you have to ask yourself, do you feel lucky, well do you Tom R?
;)
[/ot][/QUOTE]

OK, I exposed my ignorance about ordnance etc. After all, I was in the Signal Corps and we didn't like things that blew up. My point was to show some irony in the conversation. The debate as to how much to spend to save a live versus the other side of the ledger; how much is spent to take one. Luck is akin to superstition. I don't believe in either.
 

Maister

Chairman of the bored
Staff member
Moderator
Messages
28,711
Points
71
AubieTurtle said:
Though the jumpers don't always have a history of mental illness, some of this is the continuing payout of the movement in the 80s to save money by closing mental hospitals and putting the patients on the street with a bottle of pills and a good luck wish. That's certainly a decision that has cost several orders of magnitude greater than the savings.
Can someone give me an Amen? The jumper in question may or may not have suffered from a bona fide mental illness but without digging deep I can think of not less than 4 incidents locally where someone who was released from the regional psychiatric hospital caused a public 'scene' which in various ways inconvenienced/cost the public something (including a controversial homicide). Maybe it's because one of the State's two psych hospitals is in my town that the issue seems so close to home, but I remember that the month after the huge cuts in federal funding took place in the 80's the local homeless population boomed. :-#
 

el Guapo

Capitalist
Messages
5,995
Points
31
OK, I exposed my ignorance about ordnance etc. After all, I was in the Signal Corps and we didn't like things that blew up. My point was to show some irony in the conversation. The debate as to how much to spend to save a live versus the other side of the ledger; how much is spent to take one. Luck is akin to superstition. I don't believe in either.
Yep, I was just being goofy. You made a good point.
 

BKM

Cyburbian
Messages
6,463
Points
29
Maister said:
Can someone give me an Amen? The jumper in question may or may not have suffered from a bona fide mental illness but without digging deep I can think of not less than 4 incidents locally where someone who was released from the regional psychiatric hospital caused a public 'scene' which in various ways inconvenienced/cost the public something (including a controversial homicide). Maybe it's because one of the State's two psych hospitals is in my town that the issue seems so close to home, but I remember that the month after the huge cuts in federal funding took place in the 80's the local homeless population boomed. :-#
This guy turned out to be a businessman despondent over bankruptcy.
 

tsc

Cyburbian
Messages
1,905
Points
23
that happens once or twice a year around the ny metro area.... and it shuts down the bridge for hours..... I know they are reaching for help... but I wouldn't feel too sympathetic if I had to cross a bridge to get to work.
 

GeogPlanner

Cyburbian
Messages
1,433
Points
25
being "emergency personnel" myself, i have a hard time with this. i thought that towing the car would have been great b/c the guy would have been distracted. tasers work quite well in taking down someone, but you have to get close. tranqs dont work fast enough (maybe a tranq with a taser bullet?...i smell a patent). and i have been tied up for hours with a suicidal person. it sucks. eventually the police go swat on the person's a$$ and subdue them. i'm surprised that bridges don't have higher gates and such to keep people from trying. it is a cry for help and attention. anyone who wants to die will make it happen without incident. people who threaten need real help. but i wonder if we left these people alone, maybe told them where to get help and moved on if they would really follow through? i do think that committing a swat team and ems people to a scene is not the ideal use of resources.
 

DA Monkey

Cyburbian
Messages
84
Points
4
We dont have much of this thing in my City so my understanding of the issue is somewhat limited. But I go with the thought - we do whatever it takes, whatever it costs".

You really cant measure the cost of a life.

Im not a christian as such (or have any formal religous qualifications) but I firmly believe you must help where you are able - and yes at times you do have to reach a point where you have done what you can - but not in the case of a life.

I tend to agree that most of these people are asking for help/attention but dont have anyone. Personally I would do whatever I can to help a person I knew.

I have resigned from work in Arabia and returned to Australia to be with someone who needed me - even though it cost me a few years financially it was worth it (and the person did not die at that time either).

My friend has just returned from an OS holiday to be with his friend who is going through some tough stuff.

When my wife broke down at work (it took her two years of treatment to face people again - she was and now again is a nurse) all sorts of people helped - people I have never met or heard of put themselves to great expense and effort to help - its really an experience.

Getting back to the nuts and guts - with society wasting so much resources and money on issues such as dinners for visiting pollies, advertising election speeches etc why do we complain when somebody is "saved" or helped at cost to services developed specifically for that situation.

Sorry for the rant :-$
 

GeogPlanner

Cyburbian
Messages
1,433
Points
25
DA Monkey said:
Getting back to the nuts and guts - with society wasting so much resources and money on issues such as dinners for visiting pollies, advertising election speeches etc why do we complain when somebody is "saved" or helped at cost to services developed specifically for that situation.

Sorry for the rant :-$
good point. i guess i'd rather do good by saving someone rather than spending it on a luxury box at a baseball stadium
 

mgk920

Cyburbian
Messages
4,202
Points
26
boiker said:
we in the Midwest don't understand this concept of vertical-ness. IF someone jumps to commit suicide here, It's probably a long leap across the flatness of an expressway, not down from a building ;) har har.

Seriously, there doesn't seem to be a humane or episode free way to resolve these instances. Traffic will get backed up.. it's not the usual routine to see someone on a bridge. A person that commits or threatens suicide in a grandiose manner is either mental or just trying to draw attention to themselves.... Like that UW-Madison student.
There are several bridges here in the Appleton area (a 25-30 meter deep river valley cuts through the center of the city) that are certainly high enough to attract suicides, but I am not aware of any over the past 5-10 years or so.

Mike
 
Top