• Ongoing coronavirus / COVID-19 discussion: how is the pandemic affecting your community, workplace, and wellness? 🦠

    Working from home? So are we. Come join us! Cyburbia is a friendly big tent, where we share our experiences and thoughts about urban planning practice, planning adjacent topics, and whatever else comes to mind. No ads, no spam, no social distancing.

Article - As U.S. 'superstar' cities thrive, weaker ones get left behind

JNA

Cyburbian Plus
Messages
25,653
Points
59


a Reuters analysis of federal data shows just how unevenly the spoils of growth have been divided.

In a ranking of 378 metropolitan areas by how their share of national employment changed from 2010 to 2017, 40% of the new jobs generated during that time went to the top 20 places, along with a similar share of the additional wages.

Those cities represent only about a quarter of the country’s population and are concentrated in the fast-growing southern and coastal states.
None were in the northeast, and only two were in the “rust belt” interior - Grand Rapids, Michigan, and a rebounding Detroit.

Related article
A superstar city is born
Everyone loses when cities compete to draw in members of the “creative class.”


the way to grow a “middling city” into a “superstar city” is to convince both large companies to set up shop there, as well as lure in plucky entrepreneurs who can grow their budding businesses into flowers of innovation.
 
Last edited:

Luca

Cyburbian
Messages
1,188
Points
22
Perhaps this trend towards superstar cities putting the rest in the shade is a parallel to the comparable dynamic among corporations, with a few very successful ones garnering a large % of overall profits and the rest barely surviving on a diet of cost-cutting and ultra-loose monetary policy.
 
Top