-
Cyburbia is a friendly big tent, where we share our experiences and thoughts about urban planning practice, the built environment, planning adjacent topics, and anything else that comes to mind. No ads, no spam, and it's free. It's easy to join!
Content neutral sign regulations
- Thread starter mcmplans
- Start date
Repo Man
Cyburbian
- Messages
- 2,545
- Points
- 25
The APA has a nice free guide on Context Sensitive sign guidelines.
http://www.planning.org/signs/index.htm
http://www.planning.org/signs/index.htm
OhioPlanner
Cyburbian
- Messages
- 304
- Points
- 11
The APA guide is really helpful.
Content Neutral? All sign ordinances are supposed to be content neutral. You are not legally allowed to regulate on the basis of content. That would be a violation of free speech.
Content Neutral? All sign ordinances are supposed to be content neutral. You are not legally allowed to regulate on the basis of content. That would be a violation of free speech.
All sign ordinances are supposed to be content neutral. True. Most are not. I have not been able to find any good examples that are content neutral. They all have some regulations based on the content of the sign (such as political sign, real estate sign, etc.).
Thanks for the link to the APA document. I hope that it will help.
Thanks for the link to the APA document. I hope that it will help.
We recently went through the exercise of making our sign regulations content neutral. There's a few places where a sign lawyer has disagreed with us, but our County Counsel believes that it would now pass muster. Here's the link.
=Bob
http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/dplu/docs/z6000.pdf
=Bob
http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/dplu/docs/z6000.pdf
SideshowBob
Cyburbian
- Messages
- 110
- Points
- 6
OhioPlanner said:
So in other words, if a sign otherwise meets your standards, it can advertise something else? If a pizza parlor wants to use some of its signage to advertise for Target, it can do so?
Put another way, it is not legal to say that signs must not be "off-premise," meaning that they cannot advertise something that does not occur on the site
SideshowBob
Cyburbian
- Messages
- 110
- Points
- 6
Our Code is NOT content nuetral. For example, in a Residential zone, permitted businesses (typically Churches) can have signs that serve only to show the name and address of the business. We have a Church that wants moveable letters, but I said no.
So should I enforce our code or should i allow any content to be constitutional?
(I would like my job if not for signs ;-) )
So should I enforce our code or should i allow any content to be constitutional?
(I would like my job if not for signs ;-) )
True, standards for real estate signs and political signs are, by definition, regulated by content, but I think this is one area where even the most careful attorneys would feel comfortable with stepping into content. (I worked on several sign ordinances with a nationally recognizd sign expert and he didn't have a problem with singling out political and real estate signs as separate sign types). However, when you do regulate political signs, its a good idea to define them as signs related to any political issue, election, referendum, etc. Don't define them as signs related to an election for a specific candidate. Also, its safer as far as potential litigation to not say that they have to be taken down X number of days after the election, referendum, etc.
Its also good to have a blanket statement saying that a noncommercial message may be substituted on a sign where there would normally be a commercial message. This substitution, though, does not waive any sign area, height, or other requirements.
Its also good to have a blanket statement saying that a noncommercial message may be substituted on a sign where there would normally be a commercial message. This substitution, though, does not waive any sign area, height, or other requirements.