michaelskis
Cyburbian
- Messages
- 20,403
- Points
- 53
I think it is no secret that some buildings are designed better than others. Unfortunately, I think architects are too often tying to push the limits and builders and trying to push the profits, so we don't get much in the way of amazing looking buildings and are truly fitting of their occupants. Take the Roy E. Disney Animation Building for example. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walt_...dia/File:Roy_E._Disney_Animation_Building.jpg
Here is a building that house a couple of large assembly spaces, offices, and conference rooms. Not unlike many occupant needs of a school or a few other places. But when you look at it, there is zero question of what it is, and who the occupant is. But I think this is an exception rather than the norm.
What other similar buildings fit this idea of being truly indicative of the occupant and use?
Here is a building that house a couple of large assembly spaces, offices, and conference rooms. Not unlike many occupant needs of a school or a few other places. But when you look at it, there is zero question of what it is, and who the occupant is. But I think this is an exception rather than the norm.
What other similar buildings fit this idea of being truly indicative of the occupant and use?