This is the latest example of how far anti-smart growth extremists will go. Good Jobs First put out a report "The Jobs are Back in Town," then the Heartland Institute puts out their "New Report Confirms Smart Growth Raises Housing Prices" authored by Wendell Cox and Ronald D. Utt. Now here is the core problem. Cox-Utt take data from the Jobs report saying that the figures are for construction costs per residence. But even the most casual reading of Jobs report would reveal that the data are dollar data are given PER NEW RESIDENT over a ten year period. It should also be noted, of course, that construction cost data are not the whole story; selling prices for the different classes discussed should be analyzed, because of differences in various inputs. Based on their completely wrong interpretation, Cox-Utt then make claims that smart growth raises housing prices. Logically, I see only two explanations. Either two very seasoned professionals showed their incompetence, or they intentionally misinterpreted the data to make their usual attack on smart growth. So now the issue is will the Heartland Institute use its PR machine to spread the word about the authors' embarrassing failure. Considering the intellectual incest that the anti-smart growth crowd practices, however, there are probably publications already produced based on the Cox-Utt release.