• Cyburbia is a friendly big tent, where we share our experiences and thoughts about urban planning practice, planning adjacent topics, and whatever else comes to mind. No ads, no spam, no echo chambers. Create your FREE Cyburbia ID, and join us today! You can also register through your Reddit, Facebook, Google, Twitter, or Microsoft account.

Levels of preservation regulation

ROBERT

Member
Messages
19
Points
1
Is anyone familiar with a hp ordinance that is set up to offer various levels of preservation regulations (ie, level 1 would be minimal and level 5 would be the most restrictive and offer the most protection)? It is my direction to create such a document, any suggestions will be
appreciated.
 

larryshure

Member
Messages
11
Points
1
Rating historic resources is frowned upon by preservation purists. It encourages a mindset that will allow a 3 to be torn down while preserving a 4, at least until the 4 is threatened when there's a perfectly good 5 just down the street. Ideally, something is historic or it isn't. The ordinance I work with recognizes contributing and non-contributing structures within landmark districts. Technically they are both subject to the same review procedures, but a non-contributing building obviously wouldn't require the same kind of rigorous review. Many surveys will identify significant, contributing, and non-contributing resources, with significant being the most important historically with the highest level of integrity.
 
Top